THE ADMINISTRATIVE "DEEP" STATE HAS TAKEN CONTROL OF OUR ELE

HOW WE GOT HERE

HOW WE GOT HERE

LAWMAKERS DO NOT UNDERSTAND OUR ELECTIONS PROCESSES.

OUR ELECTIONS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT.

ELECTION LAWS ARE LOOSELY ADHERED TO.

CHAIN OF CUSTODY AND ~~INTERNET~~ NETWORK CONNECTIVITY DESTROY TRUST IN OUR ELECTIONS.

PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUESTS ARE STALLED AND LITIGATED.

UNELECTED EXECUTIVE OFFICIALS OBFUSCATE STATUTES.

OUR ELECTIONS CANNOT BE AUDITED.

LAWMAKERS DO NOT UNDERSTAND OUR ELECTIONS PROCESSES

Due to NONDELEGATION DOCTRINE violations, the first pillar of an administrative state, in which the Legislative Branch abandons their duty in regards to election procedures, giving the Executive Branch near full authority over adoption of new voting standards, and effectively breaching the separation of powers.

APPOINTED ELECTION OFFICIALS WIELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

As an effect of NONDELEGATION DOCTRINE violations, Executive branch Chief Election Officials of state and federal governments exercise complete autonomy in the adoption and implementation of election procedures, in a manifestation of the second pillar of an administrative state, EXECUTIVE CONTROL OF AGENCIES.

LAWFUL ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS IS LITIGATED OR STALLED

While timely limitations for election contests are enforced by the same agencies stalling investigations, effectively violating citizen’s right to conduct a timely, independent audit. This is an effect of THE ABOVE TWO PILLARS called PROCEDURAL RIGHTS, the third pillar of an administrative state.

JUDGES ISSUE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND OBSCURE RULINGS

Related to election security, due to NONDELEGATION-violating statutes deferring to an Executive Agency for clarification, resulting in JUDICIAL DEFERENCE, the fourth pillar of an administrative state.

AGENCIES EXERCISE AUTHORITY TO PROMULGATE AND ENFORCE RULES

And adjudicate disputes with the force of law due to THE ABOVE FOUR PILLARS facilitating the fifth pillar of an administrative state; AGENCY DYNAMICS. This results in agencies investigating themselves when questions arise regarding their practices.

WE MUST DEMAND OUR REPRESENTATIVES TAKE BACK THEIR PLENARY POWER TO CREATE ELECTION LAWS, AUTHORIZE NEW PROCEDURES, ADD DUE PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION OF STATUTES, and BIND EXECUTIVE AGENCY OFFICIALS TO THE WILL OF THE DULY ELECTED LEGISLATURES.

LAWMAKERS DO NOT UNDERSTAND OUR ELECTIONS PROCESSES.

OUR ELECTIONS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT.

ELECTION LAWS ARE LOOSELY ADHERED TO.

CHAIN OF CUSTODY AND ~~INTERNET~~ NETWORK CONNECTIVITY DESTROY TRUST IN OUR ELECTIONS.

PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUESTS ARE STALLED AND LITIGATED.

UNELECTED EXECUTIVE OFFICIALS OBFUSCATE STATUTES.

OUR ELECTIONS CANNOT BE AUDITED.

LAWMAKERS DO NOT UNDERSTAND OUR ELECTIONS PROCESSES

Due to NONDELEGATION, the first pillar of an administrative state, in which the Legislative Branch abandons their duty in regards to election procedures, giving the Executive Branch near full authority over adoption of new voting standards, and effectively breaching the separation of powers.

APPOINTED ELECTION OFFICIALS WIELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

As an effect of NONDELEGATION, Executive branch Chief Election Officials of state and federal governments exercise complete autonomy in the adoption and implementation of election procedures, in a manifestation of the second pillar of an administrative state, EXECUTIVE CONTROL OF AGENCIES.

LAWFUL ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS IS LITIGATED OR STALLED

While timely limitations for election contests are enforced by the same agencies stalling investigations, effectively violating citizen’s right to conduct a timely, independent audit. This is an effect of THE ABOVE TWO PILLARS called PROCEDURAL RIGHTS, the third pillar of an administrative state.

JUDGES ISSUE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND OBSCURE RULINGS

Related to election security, due to NONDELEGATION-themed statutes deferring to an Executive Agency for clarification, resulting in JUDICIAL DEFERENCE, the fourth pillar of an administrative state.

AGENCIES EXERCISE AUTHORITY TO PROMULGATE AND ENFORCE RULES

And adjudicate disputes with the force of law due to THE ABOVE FOUR PILLARS facilitating the fifth pillar of an administrative state; AGENCY DYNAMICS. This results in agencies investigating themselves when questions arise regarding their practices.

ATTEND OUR NEXT MEETINGS WITH UPCOMING CANDIDATES AND ASK THEM HOW THEY WILL ADDRESS THE DRIFT AWAY FROM A REPRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC TO AN ADMINISTRATIVE STATE.

IF YOU HAVE ATTENDED OUR POLL WATCHER COURSE, YOU HAVE SEEN OUR SUGGESTED METHODS. JOIN US AT OUR NEXT MEETING OR EVENT TO HELP US.

SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO OUR SOCIALS AS WE RECALIBRATE TO FOCUS ON THE REAL CULPRIT: THE ADMINISTRATIVE "DEEP" STATE. DONATIONS ACCEPTED.

Aubree
Takingbacktexas.org

tbtr.us

For More Information

The Deep State can be identified. The Deep State IS the Administrative State, a state of governance which exists in contrast to a representative republic.

Obtén más información

THE ADMINISTRATIVE "DEEP" STATE HAS TAKEN CONTROL OF OUR ELE

HOW WE GOT HERE

LAWMAKERS DO NOT UNDERSTAND OUR ELECTIONS PROCESSES.

OUR ELECTIONS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT.

ELECTION LAWS ARE LOOSELY ADHERED TO.

CHAIN OF CUSTODY AND ~~INTERNET~~ NETWORK CONNECTIVITY DESTROY TRUST IN OUR ELECTIONS.

PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUESTS ARE STALLED AND LITIGATED.

UNELECTED EXECUTIVE OFFICIALS OBFUSCATE STATUTES.

OUR ELECTIONS CANNOT BE AUDITED.

LAWMAKERS DO NOT UNDERSTAND OUR ELECTIONS PROCESSES

Due to NONDELEGATION, the first pillar of an administrative state, in which the Legislative Branch abandons their duty in regards to election procedures, giving the Executive Branch near full authority over adoption of new voting standards, and effectively breaching the separation of powers.

APPOINTED ELECTION OFFICIALS WIELD UNCONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

As an effect of NONDELEGATION, Executive branch Chief Election Officials of state and federal governments exercise complete autonomy in the adoption and implementation of election procedures, in a manifestation of the second pillar of an administrative state, EXECUTIVE CONTROL OF AGENCIES.

LAWFUL ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS IS LITIGATED OR STALLED

While timely limitations for election contests are enforced by the same agencies stalling investigations, effectively violating citizen’s right to conduct a timely, independent audit. This is an effect of THE ABOVE TWO PILLARS called PROCEDURAL RIGHTS, the third pillar of an administrative state.

JUDGES ISSUE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND OBSCURE RULINGS

Related to election security, due to NONDELEGATION-themed statutes deferring to an Executive Agency for clarification, resulting in JUDICIAL DEFERENCE, the fourth pillar of an administrative state.

AGENCIES EXERCISE AUTHORITY TO PROMULGATE AND ENFORCE RULES

And adjudicate disputes with the force of law due to THE ABOVE FOUR PILLARS facilitating the fifth pillar of an administrative state; AGENCY DYNAMICS. This results in agencies investigating themselves when questions arise regarding their practices.

ATTEND OUR NEXT MEETINGS WITH UPCOMING CANDIDATES AND ASK THEM HOW THEY WILL ADDRESS THE DRIFT AWAY FROM A REPRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC TO AN ADMINISTRATIVE STATE.

IF YOU HAVE ATTENDED OUR POLL WATCHER COURSE, YOU HAVE SEEN OUR SUGGESTED METHODS. JOIN US AT OUR NEXT MEETING OR EVENT TO HELP US.

SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO OUR SOCIALS AS WE RECALIBRATE TO FOCUS ON THE REAL CULPRIT: THE ADMINISTRATIVE "DEEP" STATE. DONATIONS ACCEPTED.

linktr.ee/tbtx

Aubree
Takingbacktexas.org

For More Information

The Deep State can be identified. The Deep State IS the Administrative State, a state of governance which exists in contrast to a representative republic.

Obtén más información

The Administrative "DEEP" State

Shadow Governments

Overview

“The average citizen should be able to explain to their children how our ballots are cast, counted, tabulated and reported.” - TBTX

Currently, few select computer engineers are able to explain how our votes are handled even at the lowest levels. Computerized voting systems add an additional layer of obfuscation to our most important mechanism of self-governance, a system already rife with fraud.

Election integrity is now a bipartisan issue, with Democrats seemingly believing the 2016 General Election stolen from Clinton, via Russian hackers, and now a significant number of Republican, Independent and Democrat American voters believe that the 2020 General Election was rigged against Trump. Due to these circumstances, we do believe that this information will clear the fog of political war and allow Americans of all creeds and colors to see the true issues for what they are.

We are in the final stages of a shift in power, from duly elected representatives of the People to private agencies, unelected bureaucrats in positions of power, and ultimately obfuscating culpability in blatantly unconstitutional government schemes conducted against the People of the United States of America.

We train citizens in how we got started, what we have learned and how we will demand answers and meaningful change. We will show you how to educate yourselves on State Statutes, Federal Statutes and Administrative Policies, track the path of globalist election agenda items in your state, identify weakness in state statutes, draft legislation and position your own political party to favor meaningful changes in election security.

Undue Influence and Improper Practice.

Despite the statutes clearly laid out above, which were drafted, debated and passed by your state’s legislature, certain procedures are being quietly implemented, without explicit approval by the legislature, by agencies and officials in charge of your elections. NGOs made up of public officials blur the line between governmental agencies and private, special interests by soliciting membership from state and federal public officials. Keep an eye out for National and State “Associations” and “Conferences” for state and county level seats holding purview over Elections. This is where questionable policies from potentially problematic NGOs are being incorporated into our official election procedures.

The Chief election official in a given state is often the Secretary of State or other appointed official separate from the legislature, who is tasked with overseeing the implementation of legislative will in their state’s elections. Secretaries of State who have been appointed as Chief Election Officers in their states are often part of NGOs like the NASS (National Association of Secretaries of State) and ACR (Administrative Codes and Registers) while Chief Election Officers who are NOT their state’s sitting SOS are often members of NGOs like ASCLS (American Society of Clerks and Secretaries) and The Election Center (aka National Association of Election Officials). Many SOS and Chief Election Officers across the country have been given a certain amount of authority over designs and implementation of election procedures by their respective legislatures, effectively facilitating a violation of Article 1, Section 4 of the National Constitution.

Legislatures must be careful to avoid relinquishing their plenary and Constitutional authority over the creation, implementation and enforcement of election procedures, or be implicated in a nondelegation situation where private interest designs our state elections regardless of the will of the legislature, with impunity. Below are a few examples of some of the more influential organizations with influence over election officers in your state.

The Administrative State = The Deep State = Shadow Government

President Trump, along with many concerned American citizens, have been mocked for using terms like “The Deep State” and “Shadow Government” while being challenged to name the perpetrators. After this brief rundown of the current situation, you will be more easily able to identify the source of undue influence and improper practice in your own local elections.

NGOs Influencing U.S. Elections.

National Association of State Election Directors (NASED)

Founded in 1989 - formed by “The Election Center” National Association of Election Directors

Non-Partisan U.S. organization that disseminates election administration best practices and information across the states.

National Association of Counties (NACo)

Non-Partisan U.S. organization that serves as a medium for the exchange of information between the states and fosters cooperation in the development of public policy.

Administrative Codes and Registers (ACR)

A branch of the NASS, the goal of this group is to disseminate facts, information and ideas that relate to the development, quality, publication and knowledge of administrative codes and Law.

The Center for Election Science

A National, Non-Partisan, Non-Profit focused on pushing “Approval Voting” methods.

The Election Center aka National Association of Election Officials

A Non-Partisan, Non-Profit organization composed mostly of members who are actively employed in the U.S. government, with an emphasis on shaping election procedures.

Fair Elections Center

Founded in 2017 - Washington, DC

Non-Partisan, Non-Profit organization focused on voting rights and election reform for marginalized communities.

American Society for Public Administration

Founded in 1939

Society for advocating greater effectiveness in government, purveyors of progressive theory and practice and providers of global citizenship.

Center for Tech and Civic Life

Founded in 2012

Team of civic technologists, election administration and data experts working to foster a more informed and engaged democracy/ modernize U.S. Elections.

American Society of Legislative Clerks and Secretaries (ASCLS)

ASLCS was allegedly founded to improve legislative administration and communication between clerks and secretaries throughout the U.S. and its territories. Similar to the NASS, the difference being that, when your chief election official is not the secretary of state, this is the NGO that they are likely an active member of.

National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS)

Founded in 1904

Non-Partisan U.S. organization that serves as a medium for the exchange of information between the states and fosters cooperation in the development of public policy.

Watch the Deep State in Real Time

THE ADMINISTRATIVE "DEEP" STATE: AGENCY DYNAMICS

Here is an example of one of the FIVE PILLARS of the ADMINISTRATIVE "DEEP" STATE from an exchange between Senator Hawley and the Deputy FBI Director.

A clear example of how AGENCY DYNAMICS can effectively obscure responsibility for any and all agency overreach, making it impossible for even the Congress to investigate constitutional abuses originating in the executive branch.

THE ADMINISTRATIVE "DEEP" STATE: PROCEDURAL RIGHTS

Here is an example of one of the FIVE PILLARS of the ADMINISTRATIVE "DEEP" STATE from an exchange between Senator Cruz and the Deputy FBI Director.

A clear example of how PROCEDURAL RIGHTS can be effected an violated, obscuring responsibility for any and all agency overreach, making it impossible for even the Congress to investigate constitutional abuses originating in the executive branch.

THE ADMINISTRATIVE "DEEP" STATE: NONDELEGATION

Here is an example of one of the FIVE PILLARS of the ADMINISTRATIVE "DEEP" from my interview with RedPill78 about my work tracking the source of what appear to be executive level authorization, or other undue influence, of the violation of state statutes once the state legislature gives their plenary power of creating election procedures over to the executive branch of government.

A clear example of how NONDELEGATION can effectively blind legislatures to election procedures, while obscuring responsibility for the potential facilitation of election fraud, making it impossible for even the Congress and state legislatures to navigate these obfuscations of the original intent of the legislature and mockery of the national and state constitutions.